Side-by-side comparison of Dioptra vs Spellbook:
| Feature | Dioptra | Spellbook | 
|---|---|---|
| Core Focus | AI-powered contract review with lawyer-level accuracy | AI contract review, drafting, and redlining | 
| Integration | Microsoft Word add-in, CLM systems, APIs | Native Microsoft Word add-in | 
| AI Capabilities | Automated redline generation, clause extraction, playbook distillation | Contract review, drafting, redlining with tracked changes | 
| Accuracy | 90%+ accuracy in redline generation and issue detection | High accuracy with user feedback learning | 
| Customization | Playbook-driven rules from past negotiations | Customizable playbooks for review preferences | 
| Risk Detection | Advanced issue detection, non-market risks, dispute resolution flagging | Risk identification, missing clauses, ambiguous language | 
| Automation Level | Up to 80% time savings, handles low-risk contracts automatically | Streamlined workflow with AI suggestions | 
| Multi-Document | Batch processing capabilities | Agentic AI "Associate" for multi-document review | 
| Analytics | Post-signature contract summaries and analytics | Contract insights and reporting | 
| Clause Library | Preferred language templates from negotiations | Spellbook Library with historical contract clauses | 
| Enterprise Features | Partnership with AAA for arbitration clauses, enterprise integrations | Enterprise security, group training, dedicated support | 
| Pricing | Enterprise-focused, custom pricing | Custom pricing based on team size | 
| Target Market | Major law firms (Wilson Sonsini), enterprise legal teams | Law firms and in-house legal teams globally | 
Bottom Line: While Spellbook offers solid AI-powered contract tools, Dioptra delivers superior accuracy, deeper legal intelligence, and true enterprise-grade capabilities that make it the clear choice for serious legal teams who need lawyer-level precision in their contract review process.




















